Effect of financial decentralization on service delivery among administrative staff in Central Equatorial State, South Sudan. A cross-sectional study.

Authors

  • Charles Modi Team University, Kampala.
  • Dr. Simon Mwesigwa Team University, Kampala.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70572/agp.v3i5.27

Keywords:

Service delivery, financial decentralization, Central Equatorial state, South Sudan

Abstract

Background:

Financial decentralization refers to the transfer of competencies, responsibilities, and financial resources from the central (state) level to the lower levels of government. Performance of decentralized services by county governments can be measured by indicators of allocative efficiency, accountability, reduction of corruption, and equity in service delivery. The study aimed at determining the effect of financial decentralization on service delivery in Central Equatorial State, South Sudan.

 Methodology:

The study adopted both descriptive cross-sectional survey research design and explanatory research design to identify, analyze, and describe the relationship between financial decentralization and service delivery. The target population of the study was the county administration staff. A stratified random sampling technique was used. A representative sample of 150 residents (50 from each county) was selected.  Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analysis.

 Results:

There was positive statistically significant relationship between financial decentralization and service delivery(p<0.05), majority 82% of the respondents agreed that county government has sufficient power to decide on how to raise revenue, 52% agreed that the county government met the budget for locally generated revenue in the last financial year and 86% agreed that the county government has the authority to set the rates and charges for devolved services.

 Conclusion:

There is a statistically significant influence of financial decentralization on service delivery in Central Equatorial State, South Sudan. A positive increase in financial decentralization leads to an increase in service delivery in Central Equatorial State, South Sudan.

 Recommendation:

The national government and county should put in place a set of deliberate and proactive processes, policies, and structures that support financial decentralization. The national government should review existing policy on financial decentralization with a view to increasing funding to counties.

Author Biographies

Charles Modi, Team University, Kampala.

 is a student of master of Public Administration at Teams University

Dr. Simon Mwesigwa, Team University, Kampala.

 is a research supervisor at Teams University

References

Amin, M. (2005). Social Sciences Research, Conception, Methodology, and Analysis. Kampala: Makerere University Press.

Ahmad, J., Devarajan, S., Khemani, S., & Shah, S. (2005). Decentralization and Service Delivery. Policy Research Working Paper 3603. The World Bank: Washington, D.C.

https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515.00018

Akorsu, P. K. (2015). An evaluation of the effectiveness of revenue mobilisation in the public sector of Ghana: the case of Cape Coast Metropolitan Assembly. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(1), 1-16.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (8th ed.). New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.

Finzgar, M., & Oplotnik, Z. J. (2013). Comparison of fiscal decentralization systems in the EU-27, according to selected criteria. Lex Localis -Journal of Local Self-Government, 11(3), 651-672. https://doi.org/10.4335/11.3.651-672(2013)

Freinkman, L., & Plekhanov, A. (2009). Fiscal decentralisation and the quality of public services in Russian regions. Working Paper No. 111. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1548324

Gailmard, S. (2012). Accountability and principal-agent models. Chapter prepared for the Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford.

Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., & Sanz, I. (2013). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth: Spending versus revenue decentralisation. Economic Inquiry, 51(4), 1915-1931.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00508.x

Halaskova, M., & Halaskova, R. (2014). Impacts of decentralisation on the local government expenditures and public services in the EU countries. Lex Localis Journal of Local Self-Government, 12(3), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.4335/12.3.623-642(2014)

Kim, A. (2008). Decentralization and the Provision of Public Services: Framework and Implementation. Policy Research Working Paper 4503, World Bank Capacity Building, Partnership and Outreach Team. Washington DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4503

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research Methods. Nairobi: Act Press.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies Press.

Ndung'u, G. J. (2014). Analyzing the Impact of Devolution on Economic Development Potentialities in Kenya. International Affairs and Global Strategy Journal, 26.

Kipkebut, D. J. (2010). Organisational Commitment and Job satisfaction in higher educational institutions: the Kenyan case. Unpublished PhD thesis, Middlesex: Middlesex University.

Maizura, H., Masilamani, R., &Aris, T. (2009). Reliability (Internal Consistency) of the job content questionnaire on job stress among office workers of a Multinational company in Kuala Lumpur. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 216-222.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539509331981

Olatona, J. B., &Olomola, P. A. (2015). Analysis of Fiscal Decentralization and Public Service Delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(9).

Ozmen, A. (2014). Notes on the concept of decentralization. European Scientific Journal, 10(10).

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., &Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.

Saavedra, P. A. (2010). A Study of the Impact of Decentralization on Access to Service Delivery.Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Georgia: Georgia State University.

Shapiro, S. S., &Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika Trust, 52(3/4), 591-611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709

https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Simiyu, R. S., Mweru, J. N., &Omete, F. I. (2014). The Effects of Devolved Funding on Socio- Economic Welfare of Kenyans: A Case of Constituency Development Fund in Kimilili, Kenya. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 2(7), 31-51.

Stanton, A. (2009). Decentralisation and Municipalities in South Africa: An Analysis of The Mandate to Deliver Basic Services.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Modi, C., & Mwesigwa, S. (2026). Effect of financial decentralization on service delivery among administrative staff in Central Equatorial State, South Sudan. A cross-sectional study. AfroGlobal Perspectives, 3(5), 11. https://doi.org/10.70572/agp.v3i5.27

Issue

Section

Section of Business and Economics

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.