TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY A STUDY OF MUBUKU & RWIMI PRISONS FARMS IN WESTERN UGANDA.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70572/agp.v2i1.72Keywords:
Technology Adoption, Agricultural Productivity, Mubuku & Rwimi Prisons Farms, Western UgandaAbstract
Background: This study examined the impact of technology adoption on agricultural productivity at Uganda's prison farms, focusing on Mubuku and Rwimi Prison Farms. The Uganda Prisons Service (UPS) integrates agricultural activities into the rehabilitation of inmates, using these farms to test new agricultural techniques and technologies. The study aims to identify adopted technologies, assess productivity, and explore barriers to their implementation.
Methdology: A descriptive and cross-sectional research design was used, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods. The sample consisted of 181 participants selected from a target population of 340, including Prison Farm Managers and inmates involved in farming. Data was collected via questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews, and analyzed using SPSS after classification and coding.
Results: Findings revealed that maize was the dominant crop, with 80% of respondents growing it, while only 20% cultivated beans. Livestock farming was less common (27%), with chicken farming being the most widespread. Technological adoption, including automated irrigation, renewable energy (solar panels), agricultural machinery, and integrated pest management, contributed to significant productivity increases. Notable yield improvements included a 700% increase for cowpeas and 500% for rice.
Conclusion: However, barriers to technology adoption included insufficient funding, high technology costs, limited training, poor infrastructure, and resistance to change. The study concluded that while technology adoption improved productivity, challenges like inadequate funding and infrastructure hinder broader implementation.
Recommendation: Increasing government funding, offering continuous training for prison staff and inmates, improving infrastructure, addressing resistance to change, and fostering partnerships with technology providers and research institutions to maximize the potential of these technological innovations and enhance farm sustainability.
References
Gbekor, E., Ofosu, A., & Nkrumah, E. (2021). Technology adoption and its effect on agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8(2), 102-115.
Juliana Kimono (2024): Uganda Prison Farms and Industries: Empowering Inmates, Transforming Communities. Uganda Prison Farms and Industries: Empowering Inmates, Transforming Communities - Nexus Media
Kisekka, I., Nannungi, E., & Matovu, G. (2019). Barriers to agricultural technology adoption in Uganda: A case study of smallholder farmers. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15(1), 34-45.
Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF). (2018). Agricultural sector development strategy and investment plan (2010/11–2019/20). MAAIF.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). (2020). The state of Uganda’s economy. UBOS.
World Bank. (2020). Prison rehabilitation and vocational training programs: A model for reducing recidivism and improving post-release outcomes. World Bank Report. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1621-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Godwin Atwine , Patience Nahabwe , Patience Komugisha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license allows for the following terms:
-
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any use primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
-
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. The work must be shared in its original form.
-
No Additional Restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.