KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDE TOWARDS UPTAKE OF VASECTOMY AMONG MARRIED MEN AND WOMEN AT MUNUKI PAYAM HEALTH CENTER. A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70572/agp.v1i12.23Keywords:
Vasectomy acceptance, Munuki Payam Health Center, Knowledge on vasectomy, Married men and womenAbstract
Background.
Vasectomy is a safe, cheap, and easy method of contraception. However, its uptake in Burundi is low. Moreover, matters of family planning are packaged as a female responsibility rather than a male, and it is not clear what attitude and knowledge married men and women have towards vasectomy. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude of married men and women towards vasectomy as well as demographic factors that influence vasectomy uptake.
Methodology.
A cross-sectional survey design was carried out utilizing a questionnaire. Stratified and simple random sampling was used. The sample size consisted of 234 respondents, with 142 male respondents and 92 female respondents. Descriptive statistics, independent T-test, and chi-square for assessing the association between variables using SPSS version 17 were used for data analysis.
Results.
Most of the respondents were male 60.6%, (57.3%) of respondents were less than 40 years old. 51.2% of respondents had good knowledge about vasectomy, Knowledge did not correlate with acceptance of vasectomy: 92.6% of respondents had good knowledge and 92.9% of those who had poor knowledge did not accept vasectomy (P=0.787). The overall attitude Mean score was 47.1% signifying a negative attitude towards vasectomy. 95.6% of respondents agreed that vasectomy was not acceptable in the South Sudanese culture. A significant association was noted between vasectomy acceptance and age (P=0.029) and the number of current children (P=0.012).
Conclusion.
Overall knowledge of married men and women about vasectomy was acceptable, attitude towards vasectomy was poor, and acceptance was low. Myths and misconceptions about vasectomy were noted.
Recommendation.
There is a need for greater awareness of vasectomy knowledge as a potential vehicle to affect attitude change towards vasectomy
References
Agingu Evelyne Oyamo, (2008). Knowledge and attitudes of men and women towards vasectomy as a family planning method in Winam division, Kisumu district research project submitted to the Institute of Anthropology, gender, and African Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of arts in Gender and development of the University of Nairobi.
Akpamu U., Nwoke E O., Osifo U C., Igbinovia ENS., Adisa A W., (2010). Knowledge and Acceptance of Vasectomy as a Method of Contraception amongst literate married men in Ekpoma, Nigeria. Afr.j.Biomed Res, 153156.
Altay, B., & Gonener, D. (2009). Evli erkeklerin aile planlamasıyontemlerini bilme ve kullanma durumları ve etkileyenfaktorler[Knowledge of family planning methods amongmarried men and use conditions and the factors influencing].Fırat Tıp Dergisi, 14, 56-64.
Anderson, J. E., Jamieson, D. J., Warner, L., Kissin, D. M.,Nangia, A. K., & Macaluso, M. (2012).Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: National data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilization. Contraception,85, 552-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.009 PMid:22133657
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed methods approach (2nd) Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dahal, G. P., Padmadas, S. S., & Hinde, H. (2008). Fertility limiting behaviour and contraceptive choice among men in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 34, 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1363/3400608
Dayanand, G., Singh, S., & Baruwal, C. (2014). An assessment of knowledge and attitude of vasectomy in adult males: a cross-sectional study from Pokhara, Western Nepal. Medical Science, 2(4), 164-70. https://doi.org/10.29387/ms.2014.2.4.164-170
Eisenberg, M. L., Henderson, J. T., Amory, J. K., Smith, J. F., & Walsh, T. J. (2009). Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: Data from the national survey of family growth. Urology, 74, 1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.042 PMid:19773036 PMCid:PMC2784091
Hyginus Uzo, Ezegwui, Jamike Osondu, Enwerej. (2009). Attitude of Men in Nigeria to vasectomy. International health, Elsevier, 1, 169-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inhe.2009.08.007 PMid:24036562
Kısa, S., Savaş, E., Zeyneloğlu, S., &Dönmez, S. (2017). Opinions and attitudes about vasectomy of married couples living in Turkey. American Journal of Men's Health, 11(3), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988315620275 PMid:26634860 PMCid:PMC5675235
Musa Lugwe Kidzuga (2012). Factors influencing male attitudes towards vasectomy in Kilifi district, Kenya.
Nair, G. R., Wadke, R., Relwani, N., Mahadik, V., & Anjenaya, S. (2017). Knowledge and attitude of married men towards vasectomy in an urban slum of Navi Mumbai. Int J Community Med Public Heal, 4(12), 4563-8. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20175331
NHS contraceptive services: England Community Contraceptive Clinics 2013-14; Health and Social Care Information Centre, 30 October 2014.No.7.
Ntakirutimana, C., Umuziga, P., Nikuze, B., White, R., Meharry, P., & Adejumo, O. (2019). Vasectomy is family planning: factors affecting uptake among men in the eastern province of Rwanda. Rwanda Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2(2), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.4314/rjmhs.v2i2.8
Odu, O. O., Jadunola, K. T. I., & Parakoyi, D. B. (2005). Reproductive behaviour and determinants of fertility among men in a semi-urban Nigerian community. Journal of Community Medicine & Primary Health Care, 17,1319. https://doi.org/10.4314/jcmphc.v17i1.32419
Onasoga, O. A., Edoni, E. E., & Ekanem, J. (2013). Knowledge and attitude of men towards vasectomy as a family planning method in Edo State Nigeria. Journal of research in nursing and midwifery, 2(1), 13-21.
Owopetu Christiana, Chukwuma, Sonachi & Nwozichi Chinomso, (2015). Knowledge and attitude of married men working in Babcock University, Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Midwifery, 7(3), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJNM2014.0157
Perry, B., Packer, C., Chin Quee, D., Zan, T., Dulli, L., & Shattuck, D. (2016). Recent experience and lessons learned in vasectomy programming in low-resource settings: a document review. Durham, NC: FHI 360 and Washington, DC: Population Council, the Evidence Project. Perspectives 15(3):84-87.
Polit, DF & Beck, CT. 2008. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 8th edition. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott
Survey Monkey (2019). Sample size calculator, retrieved from https://www. surveymonkey.com /mp/sample-size-calculator/)
Tijani, K. H., Ojewola, R. W., Yahya, G. L., Oluwole, A.A., & Odusanya, B. (2013). Attitudes and acceptance of Nigerians towards vasectomy. -A comparison of married men and women in Lagos. East African Medical Journal, 90, 89-94.
Tuloro, T., Deressa, W., Ali, A., & Davey, G. (2006). The role of men in the use of contraception and fertility preference in Hossana Town, southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 20, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhd.v20i3.46826
Westoff (1991). Fertility preferences. The DHS Program, retrieved from (https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/CS18/04Chapter04.pdf World Health Organization (WHO), Programming for Male Involvement in Reproductive Health, Geneva, WHO, 2002, 2012.
WHO (2018 February). Maternal Mortality, retrieved from, https:// www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal- mortality).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bior Bol Bior Agoot , Mohammed Sendagi, Salongo Kateregga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license allows for the following terms:
-
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any use primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
-
NoDerivatives: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. The work must be shared in its original form.
-
No Additional Restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

